A Gown Should Do More Than Cover Part of You.
The traditional patient gown was built to make the body accessible. GIV Gowns were designed to give clinical teams the access they need without treating coverage, comfort, dignity, or the patient experience as optional.
Traditional Gown
Front view (illustrative)
Back view (illustrative)
A basic covering that often asks the patient and care team to work around everything it does not do.
GIV Gowns
Front view
Back view
Built for Patients. Designed by Providers. Driven by Purpose.
One Inherited Standard.
One Purpose-Built System.
Traditional-gown results are shown as Yes, No, or Varies. The GIV logo and “Applies” label show where a feature applies to GIV Gowns.
| Qualifier or Statement | Traditional Gown | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
What a Patient Gown Should Do | ||
| Serves as a partial covering | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Covers the front and back of the body | – No | Applies |
| Maintains coverage while sitting, standing, and walking | – No | Applies |
| Uses secure, intentional closures | – No | Applies |
| Is designed around real human bodies rather than a one-design-fits-everything approach | – No | Applies |
| Provides soft, breathable, flexible fabric | – No | Applies |
| Offers multiple sizes and color choices | – No | Applies |
| Is designed for repeated use | Varies | Applies |
| Can be personally owned, washed, packed, and brought back to future appointments | – No | Applies |
Built for Patients | ||
| Designed with patient dignity in mind | – No | Applies |
| Helps the wearer remain covered without holding the gown closed | – No | Applies |
| Gives the wearer a clear, intuitive way to put it on | – No | Applies |
| Offers front-closing options for people who cannot comfortably reach behind themselves | – No | Applies |
| Includes closure choices that can support different mobility, dexterity, and care needs | – No | Applies |
| Supports freedom of movement without becoming another thing the patient has to manage | – No | Applies |
| Can feel familiar across repeated appointments, treatments, or recovery | – No | Applies |
| Can move with the person from appointment to recovery and home, depending on the selected design | – No | Applies |
| Makes a useful, meaningful gift for someone facing a healthcare challenge | – No | Applies |
Designed for Providers and Clinical Care | ||
| Designed by medical providers | Varies | Applies |
| Built around the needs of both the person wearing it and the person providing care | – No | Applies |
| Provides targeted, segmental access to the area being examined or treated | – No | Applies |
| Helps keep the rest of the body covered while one area is accessed | – No | Applies |
| Supports efficient exams, assessments, imaging, monitoring, or treatment | – No | Applies |
| Offers product designs for different specialties and areas of clinical access | – No | Applies |
| Can reduce reliance on removing the entire garment for access | – No | Applies |
| Can reduce reliance on workarounds such as an extra sheet or second gown | – No | Applies |
| Provides snap options for settings where magnetic closures are not appropriate | – No | Applies |
| Includes options created for mobility-focused, orthopedic, breast, chest, abdominal, front-body, and general access needs | – No | Applies |
Made for More Than One Kind of Patient | ||
| Purpose-built options for premature infants and newborns | – No | Applies |
| Purpose-built pediatric sizing and designs | – No | Applies |
| Pediatric HERO options designed to help children feel brave and like themselves | – No | Applies |
| Options for adults with limited reach, mobility, vision, or dexterity | – No | Applies |
| Options for recurring care, screenings, infusions, recovery, rehabilitation, postpartum care, and longer stays | – No | Applies |
| One broad design expected to serve nearly every specialty, body, and clinical moment | ✓ Yes | – No |
Built for Organizations and a Wider Purpose | ||
| Helps a healthcare organization visibly differentiate its patient experience | – No | Applies |
| Available with facility branding or customization options | – No | Applies |
| Designed as part of a premium, reusable patient-attire system | – No | Applies |
| A purchase contributes to the GIV Back Initiative | – No | Applies |
| Extends impact into access to care, disaster response, safe shelter, education, and economic opportunity | – No | Applies |
An Honest Comparison on Price and CategoryThe traditional gown usually costs less upfront because it contains less design, less material, fewer components, and far less functionality. | ||
| Usually offers the lowest upfront price per gown | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Was built to function as a low-cost, broad-use covering | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Represents years of product development and refinement | – No | Applies |
| Incorporates input from medical providers across multiple clinical specialties | – No | Applies |
| Contains proprietary design and intellectual property | – No | Applies |
| Uses more components to provide targeted access, secure closure, coverage, and function | – No | Applies |
| Uses premium, flexible, washable fabric selected for comfort and repeated use | – No | Applies |
| Includes purpose-built products for different patients, specialties, and clinical moments | – No | Applies |
| Should be evaluated as Patient & Clinical Experience Attire rather than a commodity covering | – No | Applies |
| Was built with the intention of replacing the traditional patient gown | – No | Applies |
What the Traditional Gown Does Remarkably Well | ||
| Leaves the back open | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Can leave the wearer feeling overexposed | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Requires the wearer to hold, pull, or adjust it to maintain coverage | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Uses ties many people cannot see or comfortably reach | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Creates confusion about which way it goes on | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Can bunch, twist, gap, tear, or lose coverage when the patient moves | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Comes in a paper version that can rip when the wearer moves | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Makes “one size fits most” do an extraordinary amount of work | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Has not been meaningfully innovated in over a hundred years | ✓ Yes | – No |
| Reminds the patient that “this is how we have always done it” | ✓ Yes | – No |
| The traditional gown is familiar. Familiar and well-designed are not the same thing. | ||
Yes, GIV Gowns cost more.
Innovation, better materials, additional components, years of development, clinical-specialist input, and intellectual property have a cost. The question is not whether GIV Gowns cost the same as the traditional gown. They do not.
The question is whether the traditional gown and everything it fails to do should remain the standard simply because it is cheaper.
“Traditional gown” refers to common paper or cotton patient gowns with open-back construction, ties, and limited specialty-specific design. Specific products vary. GIV Gowns features vary by product; review the individual product page and follow the guidance of the treating clinical team regarding sterility, imaging, monitoring, infection-control, and procedural requirements.
A Commodity Covering and a Purpose-Built Clinical Tool Are Not a Direct Comparison.
GIV Gowns are more expensive than traditional paper or cotton gowns. That is true, and we should say it plainly. They are also the product of years of development, proprietary design, better materials, more components, extensive refinement, and input from medical providers across multiple clinical specialties who told us what they needed a gown to do in order to better support both their work and the person wearing it.
The traditional gown was built to provide broad access to the body at the lowest practical cost. GIV Gowns were built around targeted access, meaningful coverage, movement, different bodies, different ages, different specialties, and different moments in care. That additional function comes at a cost because it takes more thought, more material, more construction, and more precision to produce.
We are not asking healthcare organizations or patients to view GIV Gowns as a more expensive version of the same thing. GIV Gowns define a different category: Patient & Clinical Experience Attire. They should be evaluated and budgeted based on what they are designed to contribute to the patient experience, the provider experience, clinical workflow, organizational differentiation, repeated use, and the wider purpose supported through the GIV Back Initiative. When patient satisfaction, provider satisfaction, the emotional and psychological experience of care, staff workflow, and total cost of ownership are considered alongside purchase price, we believe the additional investment is more than justified.
Do we intend for GIV Gowns to replace traditional patient gowns? Very much so. A standard does not deserve to remain the standard merely because it has been inexpensive and familiar for a very long time.
“Lowest upfront cost. Minimum function.”
“Greater investment. An entirely different level of design, function, and purpose.”

Covered Wagon
Built to perform one basic function.Fully Equipped SUV
Engineered around the journey, the people, and the conditions ahead.A covered wagon and a fully equipped SUV can both be described as transportation. That does not make them comparable. One performs the minimum function available in its era. The other reflects generations of engineering, better materials, safety, versatility, specialized tools, and preparation for the conditions ahead.
That is the clearest way to understand the difference between the traditional patient gown and GIV Gowns. Both can be called gowns. Only one was developed as a complete system around modern patients, modern providers, and modern care.
Patients Have Been Telling Healthcare What the Gown Feels Like.
These findings came from a 928-person survey of the traditional patient-gown experience. They describe documented problems with exposure, fit, usability, and comfort. The research does not evaluate GIV Gowns specifically; GIV Gowns were designed in response to the same problems these studies continue to identify.
Other published research referenced on our Healthcare Facilities page has evaluated redesigned patient attire for coverage, donning and removal, mobility, clinical access, patient preference, provider preference, privacy, and dehumanization. Those studies did not test GIV Gowns.
Read the ResearchThe Gown Touches More Than the Supply Budget.
A purchasing comparison that stops at price per gown leaves out the people using it and much of what the attire system affects. The better evaluation includes the experience of the patient, the experience of the medical provider and clinical staff, the workarounds created by the current gown, and the total cost of keeping that system in place.
What the Patient Feels and Reports
Coverage, comfort, fit, ease of dressing, self-consciousness, dignity, confidence, sense of control, and preference should be measured. These are not ornamental benefits. They are part of the environment in which a person is being asked to communicate, participate, consent, and receive care.
How to evaluate: Evaluate through patient-satisfaction surveys, garment preference, reported comfort, perceived coverage, ease of use, and willingness to choose the attire again.
What the Care Team Has to Work Around
Clinical access, ease of care, gown orientation, changing time, removal and replacement, additional sheets or second gowns, interrupted workflow, and the time spent helping a patient maintain coverage all belong in the comparison.
How to evaluate: Evaluate through provider and staff satisfaction, access ratings, setup and change time, reported workarounds, and preference over the traditional gown.
What Changes Before Care Even Begins
Published research has connected traditional patient attire with exposure, self-consciousness, discomfort, poor fit, difficulty dressing, and dehumanization. GIV Gowns were designed in response to those documented failures, with coverage, comfort, familiarity, choice, and control intentionally built into the experience.
How to evaluate: Evaluate confidence, perceived dignity, sense of control, self-consciousness, and comfort before and during the care interaction. Do not present these as guaranteed clinical outcomes.
What the Organization Is Actually Buying
Useful life, laundering, loss and replacement, disposable waste, extra coverings, staff time, patient perception, provider perception, brand differentiation, and the signal a facility sends all carry value. The purchase decision is not simply cloth versus cloth. It is one patient-attire system compared with another.
How to evaluate: Evaluate with each organization’s real utilization, labor, laundering, replacement, waste, satisfaction, and experience data. Do not guarantee savings before those inputs are validated.
The cheapest gown is easy to identify. The least expensive patient-attire system is a more serious calculation.

“Over more than 15 years as a medical provider, I watched what happened when a person put on the traditional gown. I saw posture change, eyes drop, and attention shift toward staying covered instead of participating in the visit. When I began using GIV Gowns in my own facility, I witnessed a different emotional response: patients appeared more comfortable, more confident, more interactive, and more like themselves. Patients and providers have continued to relay that difference to us directly.
Those observations are not a substitute for a completed GIV-specific outcomes study, and I will not present them as one. They are firsthand clinical experience, supported by what patients and providers have reported to us and by outside research documenting the failures of traditional patient attire. We believe the effect on patient satisfaction, provider satisfaction, dignity, confidence, and the overall care interaction more than justifies the difference in price.”
Shawn Gibbs, Co-Founder & CEO of GIV Gowns and Medical Provider
Review the Evidence and Facility EconomicsSo why did we create GIV Gowns?
You're worth it!
One Gown Was Expected to Do Everything.
We Designed for the Actual Moment.
Different care settings require different access, movement, coverage, and closure decisions. The GIV Gowns Product Suite includes purpose-built options for general care, front-body access, chest and abdominal access, mobility-focused care, shorter shirt-length use, newborns, premature infants, and pediatric patients.

GIV Classic
Designed forGeneral care and full-coverage exams
View product →
GIV Forward
Designed forLimited reach, mobility, and intuitive front access
View product →
GIV Duo
Designed forTargeted chest and abdominal access
View product →
GIV Motion
Designed forShoulder, clavicle, upper-back, and arm access
View product →Clear Answers Before You Choose a Patient Gown.
Use these quick answers to understand the practical differences, then review the full comparison and the individual product details.
What is the difference between a regular hospital gown and a GIV Gown?
A regular hospital gown is typically a paper or cotton covering with an open back, ties, and broad access to the body. GIV Gowns are purpose-built patient attire designed around coverage, comfort, movement, secure closures, and targeted clinical access. Features vary by GIV product and by the requirements of the appointment or procedure.
Can I wear my own patient gown to a medical appointment?
You can bring a GIV Gown and ask your care team whether it is appropriate for the visit. The treating team or facility makes the final decision when sterility, imaging, monitoring, infection control, or procedural requirements call for specific attire.
Are GIV Gowns reusable?
Many GIV Gowns are designed for repeated personal or facility use. Materials, care instructions, closures, and intended clinical access differ by product, so review the individual product page before choosing a gown.
Why do GIV Gowns cost more than traditional patient gowns?
GIV Gowns use better materials, additional components, proprietary designs, and specialty-specific construction developed with clinical input. The comparison includes coverage, patient and provider experience, repeated use, workflow, and total value alongside the purchase price.
Which GIV Gown should I choose?
Choose based on the area your care team needs to access, your mobility and dressing needs, the level of coverage you prefer, and any procedure-specific requirements. The GIV team can help match those needs to the appropriate product.
Do Not Wait for the Standard to Change Around You.
Choose a GIV Gown for yourself or someone you love, bring it to the next appointment, and ask your care team whether it is appropriate for that visit.
Your Patients Notice What You Hand Them First.
Bring GIV Gowns into your facility as a visible standard of dignity, purposeful clinical access, and a patient experience designed with the same intention as the care you provide.


